Chiming in. I currently regularly play all three generic electric types, more accurately contemporary variants thereoff. Strat, Tele, Les Paul.
In another forum, we've just been discussing guitar individual preference predilections and why, so your post is timely in a way.
[br]From the information provided we can only guess about variable factors intrinsic within those specific models of each design you're struggling with with that Tele which can have a game changing impact upon characteristic playability or comfort. e.g. Epiphone Les Paul Standards come in several flavours with differing neck profiles, i.e.Std, Pro, Std '50s, '60s. So too do Teles.
In terms of comfort and 'fit', for me any Les Paul is the least enjoyable to actually play of the three generic types, a physically awkward instrument to balance and subsequently attributable to that, fret in any position other than when standing, when inescapably, it's still a backbreaker. That too is [u]the general concensus[/u] arrived at from the discussion mentioned in paragraph two.
[br]The Les Paul has some pragmatically dreadful inescapable design characteristics despite its inarguable aesthetic beauty. Playing mine is a perennial love hate/relationship.
Leaving aside irrationality of emotive image association influence of any guitar, my observation is that despite the imbalance and weight factors of the typical Les Paul raised indirectly in the preceding paragraph, perception of fit & comfort is a function of individual physicality in conjunction with psychological conditioning of what you're already used to as the comparative 'norm'.
Despite its accomodation of a modern C neck, Fender's Player Telecaster has a polarising 9.5" radius fingerboard and comes fitted with 9s OOTB. The Standard/Pro LP has a 12" radius fingerboard which is much more the norm these days, a middle of the road radius between flat and curved extremes. String spacing on both should be identical or so similar as to be a non-factor. If I were to hazard a stab in the dark guess at any singular factor causing your neck wrestling with that Tele, I'd suggest it's that altered fingerboard radius you are probably experiencing difficulty adapting to. Albeit marginally, the differing scale lengths also alter the fret spacing, which in conjunction with the other factors, affect overall relationship of finger placement relationship, Christopher's "micro motions required in playing".
[br]Les Pauls with their shorter scale length come fitted with 10s OOTB. Again, necks and bodies (width, weight and relative comfort) vary between the so many sub variants and models these days. I swap beween all three types several times weekly, and don't find transitioning between string gauges or scale lengths present as anything 15-30 minutes warmup and play can't adapt to. E&B 10's at lesser tension on the 628mm scale length are not particularly any more challenging to bend IMESF. N[u]ecks and radiuses OTOH are everything,[/u] hence I choose my instruments carefully with that in mind.
If you can swap the Player Series for a Tele with a 12" radius fingerboard with modern C or slim taper C neck, you might find it a better matchup/fit with what you're used to. I have two 'Teles', one with a conventional contemporary 12" radius & modern C profile, and another with a 12" to 15.75" compound radius fingerboard and slim C profile. I [u]like[/u] playing them both, but adore the Classic TC.
